Click the arrows at the bottom of your screen to visit each section.

1/3

Use the navigation bar/menu to revisit any part of the meeting.

2/3

Leave your feedback any time on our Comment Form.

3/3
Skip to main content

Study Overview, Goals, & Objectives

The Fairfield Road Planning Study will identify near-term improvements to improve safety and ease traffic congestion on the Fairfield Road corridor in Lake County. The study will also plan for future investments that enhance economic opportunity, mobility, equity, and quality of life in the area.

Study Area

The study area follows Fairfield Road from north of Gilmer Road to Oakwood Drive, an approximately 5.5 mile segment.

Study Area Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study.
Click to enlarge

Goals & Objectives

Through stakeholder, agency, and public input, the Study Team seeks to establish a shared corridor vision and identify a range of alternatives that will:

  • shield icon Increase safety for all roadway users
  • tools icon Consider potential regional transportation improvements
  • cars icon Reduce congestion and delays as population grows
  • leaf icon Avoid or minimize impacts to environmental resources such as wetlands, recreational areas, and potential historic properties
  • bike icon Provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity

About the Planning Study

Planning and Environmental Linkages Study (PEL)

A PEL Study is a planning study that provides for:

  • A collaborative approach to decision-making
  • Early consideration of:
    • Environmental resources
    • Community context
    • Future development plans
  • Incorporation of information, analysis, and planning results into environmental review
Planning and environmental linkages

Purpose of the Study

A PEL Study will be conducted to enable the following planning products to be adopted into later environmental review processes for future projects within the study limits:

  • thumbs up icon Draft Purpose and Need with federal and state concurrence
  • map pin icon Screening of alternatives to be carried forward for further study
  • tree icon Basic description of the environmental setting
  • clipboard icon Decision on methodologies for analysis
  • dollar sign icon Allows project to be eligible for potential state and federal funding

The PEL will develop a roadmap for the corridor and identify potential future projects to be carried forward for further study.

PEL Process & Schedule

PEL Process Steps

Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study Process. Steps include identifying transportation needs, developing purpose and need, developing screening criteria, developing and screening concepts, identifying reasonable alternatives, and drafting PEL report.
Click to enlarge

PEL Schedule

Schedule for Fairfield Road Planning Study. The study begins in Spring 2024 and will continue through Spring 2025.
Click to enlarge

Traffic & Crash Data

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Crash Data

Current traffic volumes on Fairfield Road within the study area range from 11,700 to 13,700 vehicles per day. The Average Daily Traffic map below indicates average daily traffic volumes at select points along Fairfield Road. With no improvements to Fairfield, traffic volumes are expected to range from 12,400 to 14,500 vehicles per day by 2050. Daily traffic volumes over 14,000 vehicles per day typically indicate a two-lane roadway is at or over capacity.

However, there are additional factors that are considered as well such as the crash data. Scroll down to view traffic and crash data.

Average Daily Traffic Volume Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study. Map includes existing 2023 traffic volumes and 2050 no-build traffic volume projections.
Click to enlarge

Intersection Crash Data (2017 – 2021)

There were 357 total crashes in the study area between 2017 and 2021. Of those crashes, 88 involved injuries, and one involved a fatality. The predominant crash type in the study area is rear-end crashes, accounting for 51 percent of total crashes. A high number of rear-end crashes can be an indication of insufficient capacity along a roadway.

Intersection Crash Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study. Break down of crashes at each intersection in the study area.
Click to enlarge

Corridor-Wide Crash Data (2017 – 2021)

Primary Crash Types within Study Area
51% Rear-end
20% Turning
9% Angle
6% Fixed object
4% Side swipe
4% Animal
4% Other
2% Side swipe opposite
car crash icon
357 Total Crashes
icon
88 Injury Crashes
icon
1 Pedestrian Crashes
icon
0 Bicycle Crash
icon
1 Fatal Crash

Common Causes of Crashes Along the Corridor

icon Hard Braking
icon Following Too Closely
icon Failure to Yield
icon Speeding

Roadway Segment Crash Data (2017 – 2021)

Roadway Segment Crash Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study. Break down of crashes at roadway segments on Fairfield Road in the study area.
Click to enlarge

Traffic Data — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersections 1–3

Traffic Level of Service Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study from Gilmer Road to Townline Road.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service A and B experience little to no congestion. Level of Service C and D experience moderate congestion. Level of Service E and F experience severe congestion.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Gilmer Road.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Chardon Road.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and IL 60.

Traffic Data — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersections 4–6

Traffic Level of Service Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study from Townline Road to Nippersink Road.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service A and B experience little to no congestion. Level of Service C and D experience moderate congestion. Level of Service E and F experience severe congestion.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Townline Road.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and IL 120.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Nippersink Road.

Traffic Data — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersections 7–9

Traffic Level of Service Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study from IL 120 to Oakwood Drive.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service A and B experience little to no congestion. Level of Service C and D experience moderate congestion. Level of Service E and F experience severe congestion.
Click to enlarge
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Hart Road.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and IL 134.
Level of Service by movement at the intersection of Fairfield Road and Long Lake Drive.

Built & Natural Environments

The study team is identifying environmental resources such as parks and wetlands, historical resources, and collecting data to develop alternatives that will improve mobility and safety on Fairfield Road while limiting impact on the built and natural environment.

Built and Natural Environmental Features Map for Fairfield Road Planning Study.
Click to enlarge

Alternatives Development & Analysis

The development of alternatives involves identifying potential solutions to the transportation needs identified through engineering analysis, stakeholder engagement and public input. Alternatives are informed by existing traffic, safety, and environmental conditions data. From that point, alternatives are screened based on criteria developed with stakeholder and public input. This stage of the PEL Study process identifies recommended alternatives that may be further developed in future Phase I studies.

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.


Purpose and Need

Screening Process

The Lake County Division of Transportation (LCDOT) is using a multi-step screening process to determine recommended project alternatives within the Fairfield Road Planning Study area. Alternatives must pass several screenings to be considered as a project the LCDOT may pursue in the future. This process incorporates engineering analysis, stakeholder engagement and public input throughout.

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Purpose and Need Statement

The Purpose of the transportation improvements in the study area is to reduce congestion on Fairfield Road and surrounding roads and improve safety for all users.

The Need for the improvements is based on feedback from the public to enhance safety and operations, to reduce congestion, to be compatible with other planned improvements on surrounding roadways, and to consider non-motorized modes of transportation for bicyclists and pedestrians.


Initial Alternatives

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Initial Alternatives

Alternatives that did not meet the Purpose and Need or have excessive impacts or cost are not carried forward to the next step.

Legend

grey minus Required to be screened as part of the PEL study process
green checkmark Advances to next level of screening
red x Does not meet criteria to advance to next level of screening

No build
Click to enlarge

grey minus No Build

  • Serves as a baseline comparison for other alternatives
  • Federally required to advance through the PEL process

2 lane
Click to enlarge
2 lane photo
Click to enlarge

red x 2-Lane

  • Does not meet Purpose and Need based on existing traffic and safety conditions

3 lane
Click to enlarge
3 lane photo
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 3-Lane

  • Meets Purpose and Need

4 lane
Click to enlarge
4 lane photo
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 4-Lane

  • Meets Purpose and Need

5 lane
Click to enlarge
5 lane photo
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 5-Lane

  • Meets Purpose and Need

Traffic and Safety

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Traffic & Safety Screening

The number of travel lanes and medium usage along the corridor are analyzed for traffic operational and safety performance.

Legend

grey minus Required to be screened as part of the PEL study process
green checkmark Advances to next level of screening
red x Does not meet criteria to advance to next level of screening

No build
Click to enlarge

grey minus No Build

  • Serves as a baseline comparison for other alternatives
  • Federally required to advance through the PEL process

3 lane
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 3-Lane

  • Moderate improvement to traffic operations
  • Moderate improvement to safety
    • Widened shoulder
    • Separation of opposing traffic
    • Dedicated storage for left turning vehicles

4 lane
Click to enlarge

red x 4-Lane

  • Moderate improvement to traffic operations
  • Low improvement to safety
    • Widened shoulder

5 lane
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 5-Lane

  • High improvement to traffic operations
  • Moderate to high improvement to safety
    • Widened shoulder
    • Separation of opposing traffic
    • Dedicated storage for left turning vehicles
    • Increased capacity reduces congestion related crashes

Impacts Screening

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Impacts Screening

Alternatives are evaluated for improvement to traffic operations, increased safety performance, impacts to adjacent lands, impacts to natural resources, technical feasibility, and construction cost.

Intersection types (stop-controlled, signalized, roundabout) determined feasible for each intersection location will be developed and analyzed in Phase I.

Legend

grey minus Required to be screened as part of the PEL study process
green checkmark Advances to next level of screening
red x Does not meet criteria to advance to next level of screening

No build
Click to enlarge

grey minus No Build

  • Serves as a baseline comparison for other alternatives
  • Federally required to advance through the PEL process

3 lane
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 3-Lane

  • Moderate improvement to traffic operations
  • Moderate improvement to safety
  • Moderate impact to right-of-way
  • Moderate impact to natural resources
  • Construction staging requires temporary impacts
  • Moderate cost

5 lane
Click to enlarge

green checkmark 5-Lane

  • High improvement to traffic operations
  • Moderate to high improvement to safety
  • Similar impact to right-of-way as 3-lane; permanent impact is higher
  • Similar impact to natural resources as 3-lane
  • Simplified construction staging
  • Higher cost

Bicycle/Pedestrian Screening

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Bicycle/Pedestrian Screening

Sidewalks, paths, and shared bike lanes are applied to the designs carried forward from the previous step and analyzed for their non-motorized operations and safety, along with impacts to adjacent land and environmental features.

Sidewalks, Paths, and Shared Bike Lanes

multi-use path
An off-road multi-use path can be provided for a safe route for pedestrians, cyclists, and other non-motorized users.
sidewalk
A sidewalk can provide dedicated space for pedestrians that is safe, comfortable, and accessible.
bicycle lane
An on-road bicycle lane can provide dedicated space for cyclists that is safe, comfortable, and accessible.

Source: Small Town and Rural Design Guide Facilities for Walking and Biking


Study Area Trails and Sidewalks

study limit map for sidewalks and trails
Click to enlarge

Your Input Matters | Interactive Comment Map & Poll Questions

Share your feedback on transportation and community needs in the project area by using the interactive comment map and poll questions. These input opportunities will be open February 27 – March 29, 2025.

Comment Map

Interactive Comment Map

Use the project area map to share location-specific input with us. Drop a pin to provide feedback on traffic, safety, bicycle/pedestrian connectivity, transit, environmental, or other considerations.

Your Input Matters | Interactive Comment Map & Poll Questions

Share your feedback on transportation and community needs in the project area by using the interactive comment map and poll questions. These input opportunities will be open February 27 – March 29, 2025.

Poll Questions

Poll Questions

Community members and other stakeholders play an important role in this PEL study and any decisions made about the future of Fairfield Road. We want to hear from you about transportation and community needs in this area! Specifically, we're asking for your input on the alternatives screening criteria and priorities for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity in the area.

Recommended Alternatives to be Carried Forward

Screening Process

Click or tap on the colored boxes to learn more.

Recommended Alternatives to be Carried Forward

The study team will continue to refine the alternatives to be carried forward based on public and stakeholder input and engineering analysis. LCDOT will use the those refined alternatives to consider potential projects for the study area to be included in a future 5-year plan. Designs determined favorable are recommended for further analysis during Phase I.

Get Involved

Thank you for visiting this online public engagement!

Your feedback is important to us. Please provide your input using one of the options below.

Comment Period Open February 27 – March 29, 2025

icon

Comment Form

Use the Comment button on the top right of your screen

icon

Mail

Lake County Division of Transportationc/o Fairfield Road Planning Study Team
600 West Winchester Road
Libertyville, IL 60048